| | |
|---|
| | | ## Sept 14th, 2018 |
|---|
| | | -------------------- |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | Thankfully, OpenCV had an implementation for DNN, which supports YOLO as well. They have done quite an amazing job, and the speed isn't too bad, either. I can score about 20~25fps on my tiny YOLO, without using GPU. |
|---|
| | | Thankfully, OpenCV had an implementation for DNN, which supports YOLO as well. They have done quite an amazing job, and the speed isn't too bad, either. I can score about 20~25fps on my tiny YOLO, without using GPU. |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | ## Sept 15th, 2018 |
|---|
| | | -------------------- |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | I tried to do an alternate approach - instead of making model identify cards as annonymous, train the model for EVERY single card. As you may imagine, this isn't sustainable for 10000+ different cards that exists in MTG, but I thought it would be reasonable for classifying 10 different cards. |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | Result? Suprisingly effective. |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | <img src="https://github.com/hj3yoo/darknet/blob/master/figures/4_detection_result_1.jpg" width="360"> <img src="https://github.com/hj3yoo/darknet/blob/master/figures/4_detection_result_2.jpg" width="360"><img src="https://github.com/hj3yoo/darknet/blob/master/figures/4_detection_result_3.jpg" width="360"> <img src="https://github.com/hj3yoo/darknet/blob/master/figures/4_detection_result_4.png" width="360"> |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | They're of course slightly worse than annonymous detection and impractical for any large number of cardbase, but it was an interesting approach. |
|---|
