| | |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | The second and third problems should easily be solved by further augmenting the dataset with random lighting and image skew. I'll have to think more about the first problem, though. |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | ## Day 1 |
|---|
| | | ## Sept 7th, 2018 |
|---|
| | | ----------------------- |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | Added several image augmentation techniques to apply to the training set: noise, dropout, light variation, and glaring: |
|---|
| | |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | <img src="https://github.com/hj3yoo/darknet/blob/master/figures/1_detection_result_1.jpg" width="360"> <img src="https://github.com/hj3yoo/darknet/blob/master/figures/1_decision_result_2.jpg" width="360"> <img src="https://github.com/hj3yoo/darknet/blob/master/figures/1_decision_result_3.jpg" width="360"> <img src="https://github.com/hj3yoo/darknet/blob/master/figures/1_decision_result_4.jpg" width="360"> <img src="https://github.com/hj3yoo/darknet/blob/master/figures/1_decision_result_5.jpg" width="360"> <img src="https://github.com/hj3yoo/darknet/blob/master/figures/1_decision_result_6.jpg" width="360"> |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | <img src="https://github.com/hj3yoo/darknet/blob/master/figures/1_learning_curve.jpg" width="360"> |
|---|
| | | <img src="https://github.com/hj3yoo/darknet/blob/master/figures/1_learning_curve.jpg" width="640"> |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | The video demo can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFE_k-mWo2A&feature=youtu.be |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | ## Sept 10th, 2018 |
|---|
| | | ----------------------- |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | I've been training a new model with a full YOLOv3 configuration (previous one used Tiny YOLOv3), and it's been taking a lot more resources: |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | <img src="https://github.com/hj3yoo/darknet/blob/master/figures/2_learning_curve.jpg" width="640"> |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | The author of darknet did mention that full network will take significantly more training effort, so I'll just have to wait. At this rate, it should reach 50k epoch in about a week :/ |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | ## Sept 13th, 2018 |
|---|
| | | ---------------------- |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | The training for full YOLOv3 model has turned sour - the loss saturated around 0.45, and didn't seem like it would improve in any reasonable amount of time. |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | <img src="https://github.com/hj3yoo/darknet/blob/master/figures/3_learning_curve.jpg" width="640"> |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | As expected, the performance of the model with 0.45 loss was fairly bad. Not to mention that it's quite slower, too. I've decided to continue with tiny YOLOv3 weights. I tried to train it further, but it was already saturated, and was the best it could get. |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | --------------------- |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | Bad news, I couldn't find any repo that has python wrapper for darknet to pursue this project further. There is a [python example](https://github.com/AlexeyAB/darknet/blob/master/darknet.py) in the original repo of this fork, but [it doesn't support video input](https://github.com/AlexeyAB/darknet/issues/955). Other darknet repos are in the same situation. |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | I suppose there is a poor man's alternative - feed individual frames from the video into the detection script for image. I'll have to give it a shot. |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | ## Sept 14th, 2018 |
|---|
| | | -------------------- |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | Thankfully, OpenCV had an implementation for DNN, which supports YOLO as well. They have done quite an amazing job, and the speed isn't too bad, either. I can score about 20~25fps on my tiny YOLO, without using GPU. |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | ## Sept 15th, 2018 |
|---|
| | | -------------------- |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | I tried to do an alternate approach - instead of making model identify cards as annonymous, train the model for EVERY single card. As you may imagine, this isn't sustainable for 10000+ different cards that exists in MTG, but I thought it would be reasonable for classifying 10 different cards. |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | Result? Suprisingly effective. |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | <img src="https://github.com/hj3yoo/darknet/blob/master/figures/4_detection_result_1.jpg" width="360"> <img src="https://github.com/hj3yoo/darknet/blob/master/figures/4_detection_result_2.jpg" width="360"><img src="https://github.com/hj3yoo/darknet/blob/master/figures/4_detection_result_3.jpg" width="360"> <img src="https://github.com/hj3yoo/darknet/blob/master/figures/4_detection_result_4.png" width="360"> |
|---|
| | | |
|---|
| | | They're of course slightly worse than annonymous detection and impractical for any large number of cardbase, but it was an interesting approach. |
|---|
